Research for Livelihood: A dangerous trend
There are 975+
universities in the country and no university is listed in best 100
universities in the world. IIT, Mumbai ranked 162nd rank. Country
means not the land, it is the people. Likewise, Institute means, it is people
who work there. Too much of science with no practicability is of no use. Lot of
science is known already. Converting knowledge into reality is a big challenge.
Since, many are trying to escape the value of sweat, Knowledge is going waste.
Government policies, guidelines, strict vigilance cannot bring changes in
science. A moral police within an individual can bring changes.
Indian Council of
Agriculture Research (ICAR) is the biggest agri-research network in the world. The
ICAR research and extension mechanism has played a pioneering role in ushering
green revolution and subsequent developments in agriculture in India through
its research and technology development that has enabled the country to
increase the production of food
grains by 5.4 times, horticultural crops by 10.1 times, fish by 15.2 times,
milk 9.7 times and eggs 48.1 times since 1951 to 2017, thus making a
visible impact on the national food and nutritional security. Among 101
ICAR research institutes and 71 agricultural universities and 700 KVKs in the
country, there are 8 major fisheries research institutes and 2 fisheries
universities. About 18700 people including technical and supporting staff at
ICAR network which is one of the largest research networks in the world, about
20000+ in state agriculture universities are working. By taking 40% as scientific
staff, about 15480 agricultural scientists are there in the country. Around 774
(5%) of scientists are with fisheries and specialization. This works out to be
one fisheries researcher for every 17.5 lakh people in the country. In
Karnataka for every 4.5 lakh people there is one fisheries development officer
and it is even less in other states in India. Each of the eight national
fisheries institutes and 30 fisheries colleges may organize 10 training programs
and it will be 370 programs a year. By taking 30 participants for each program,
our outreach through training program is 11,110 people/anum and it works out to
be 0.0082% (by taking 135 crore as present population of India). After training
and capacity building program, the uptake percentage is only less than 3. This
gives the indicative status of fisheries extension and capacity building. So, to
increase fish production from 11.6 mt to 15.0 mt and food production from 278
mt to 350 mt by 2022, we need to strengthen the extension mechanism through
innovative approaches and increase need-based, region specific, result oriented
capacity building programs.
The principles of
science is same everywhere. If China and Israel are producing more, it is
because of advance science and technology. Though we can’t adopt many of them
in Indian agriculture, most of them can be copied and produce more.
The issues bothering Agriculture
research are:
§ Research
for livelihood: Research on livelihood is fine; but just for doing research on
some hypothesis leading to waste of manpower, resources etc. That is why though
there are many claims that technologies are developed by institutes, we don’t find
them in the field. Hundreds of papers
§ Duplication
of research: By developing an app, we must regulate all the duplication of
research program and save money to the country
§ Mistrust:
Farmers and industry professionals have serious mistrust on government
institutes. We need to bridge this gap by taking up need based in collaboration
with industries and progressive farmers and bring social auditing to the investment
made on the research
§ Unrealistic
complex Concepts: Zero budget farming, Natural farming, Jaivik farming are all
new jargons which are very hard to accept. But all of them have kept their guns
on research institutes shoulder and since they are funded by the government, they
are unable make their stand clear. Even
for zero budget farming crores of rupees is allotted. Farming is an intended
activity. Unfortunately it is used with the word “Natural”. One can’t use those
words together. Whether you go by verbatim or reality, people are making their
livelihood without showing the end product.
§ Wrong
data: With wrong data, we cannot come out with right strategies. We need to
upgrade all the data that are available now.
It is not too late. Good
numbers of bright young professionals are getting into the system. With a good
team work and common objectives, scientists have to unite and work on a mission
mode project. We don’t live for 100+ years. Let’s do it fast.
No comments:
Post a Comment