Organic farming-
Complex
realities
________________________
Dr Shivakumar
Magada
Professor of Aquatic Biology
College of Fisheries, Mangalore 575 002,
India
shivakumarmagada@gmail.com
Since the birth of the earth, the
whole creation is evolving continuously. Otherwise evolution theory would not
have born. But, science is not changing every day; it
is our understanding. There was the time when somebody said that earth revolves
around the sun, church people did not agree. People were not ready to accept
that earth is round. At last, they bowed their heads in front of the science.
Our ancients beautifully identified the food crops and taught us cultivation
methods in controlled condition. During
those days everybody was farmer, everything was organic. The total arable land
was sufficient to feed the population of that time. After the Second World War
there was acute shortage of food in many countries. Growing demand for food
with increase in population was the challenge to the scientists and the
government. Due to the great efforts of scientists, who developed high yielding
varieties, hybrids and usage of chemical fertilizers, India became self
sustained with regard to food production. It was the need of the country. And
now, we have left with no option but using chemical fertilizer and pesticides.
We know the recipes of success of green revolution, but now we have to
understand the ingredients of disasters of the same too. Food production means
not just growing food for ourselves; we have to feed the hungry world. “Future
threat to the human kind is not diseases, not war; it is hunger and sheer crush
of humanity”-Magada. There is direct correlation between hunger and
humanity. Hunger is biological base for all worlds’ problem. World population
data sheet says that the Indian population was 1.5 billion in 2050; already it
is 1.349 billion. Though, annual food production of India stands about 278 million
tons (mt), 20 crores of people die of hunger and 14.5% of the population is
under nourished, 3000 children die every day. Fortunate are those who die of
starvation; unfortunate of those who survive starvation. In this context,
organic farming has to be viewed critically.
Of course, what is organic? In fact, in the whole
universe, everything is inorganic. Air, soil, plant, animals and even human
being is inorganic. If you simplify anything, you get either elements or
compounds. Whatever the food you ingest, it will be simplified into simpler
forms and gets collected and utilized. Protein will become amino acids, complex
carbohydrates will become simple sugars and fats will be divided into simple
fatty acids. Even plants require the nutrients in the ionic forms. The
requirement of the different nutrients by the plants is known scientifically.
Irrespective of the origin of the nutrients, plants require certain nutrients
which need to be supplied from external source. Only then you get higher yield.
Soil is an independent, dynamic inorganic body of nature that acquires properties
in accordance with forces which act upon it.
Hence the present packages of practice were designed to get more yields.
In fact, agronomists have always advocated integrated nutrient management i.e.
inclusive of high dose of organic manure. On the other hand, rampant and
injudicious usage of many chemicals and pesticides at all levels i.e. from the
farm till the produce reaches consumers, many problems have been raised. Foods
are contaminated with many toxic chemicals. Infant mortality rate (IMR) is
increased significantly. Kids are born with many deformities, new diseases
started and spread of disease is faster than ever before. Hence, many realized
to go organic.
Organic farming – is not a technique; it is a concept or
movement. Everyone agree that, it is the solution for the better health and
environment. Better health of how many people is the question. To save future,
people realized that organic farming is the solution. But it is not so easy to
adopt these concepts in a large scale. Because it raises many complex issues
like yield reduction, food shortage, increased food cost, uneven distribution
and hence causing social disparity. Is India ready to take up these challenges
raised by the organic farming? In the present context, organic farming is
an absurd concept but it has complex truth for the future. So, it is referred
as paradox in this text.
This is where scientists, farmers and policy makers
should join together and understand the paradoxes of organic farming without
any prejudices. On the other hand, scientists have to critically analyze the
quantity of nutrients required by the plant, methods of application of chemical
fertilizers, so that there will be minimal quantities of residue gets into the
nature. Careful study on method of absorption & retention in soil, impact
of leaching, percolation, surface run off and residual impacts and other
subtler issues have to be evaluated thoroughly before advocating the benefits
of any chemical. On the other hand promoters of organic farming have to go slow
in implementing their ideology, since it is not so easy to adopt these concepts
to the staple food crops of India i.e. wheat and rice. No doubt that organic
farming concept can be easily adoptable to perennial crops, horticultural crops
and plantation crops. Any fruits or meats that are being used as food can not
substitute wheat or rice. So, the reduction in yields of these subsidiary foods
may not make significant difference even there is short of supply. But, people
are promoting organic farming for even food crops like wheat and rice. At
present sustainable production and soil health are inversely related and it can
not be reversed in a short period or it may not be possible. In the Indian
context, the agricultural sector has been an important sector from the point of
economic growth. This transition from chemical based agriculture to organic
agriculture would depend on how well the Indian government handles this
transition period.
An underlying assumption about organic farming in this
paper is there would be great imbalance in the market because produce from
organic farming can not be sold at the cheaper rates in the domestic market. It
definitely reaches the stomach of small segment of the upper class. And many a
times, it is intended or destined to the foreign market. One should be happy,
because, at least some of our farmers get better price for their produce. While appreciating the concepts of organic
farming, we must learn to understand its impact on local consumers, domestic
markets and agro-based industries. The
adequate supplies of essential agriculture produce for mass consumption is also
a responsibility of the government. So, the impulse of market dynamics may be
high during the initial years.
Agricultural export may bring good foreign exchange, but micro
imbalances in domestic market due to variability in agricultural performances
are also important factors. The links between different sectors with
agriculture and their responses need to be thoroughly analyzed and then we must
decide the rate of transformation from chemical to organic agriculture. The
logical assumptions in this paper might look like it is against the organic
farming; but not so. It is a cross sectional approach to understand and educate
the people about organic farming.
Like sudden stopping of medicines causes some disorders
in human beings, sudden withdrawal of chemicals and fertilizers in agriculture
also causes imbalance in the total production and productivity. So, we must
withdraw usage of chemicals gradually. We must learn from history, otherwise we
become part of it. Already, certifiers of organic farming, marketers,
NGOs have established their foot in the movement of organic farming. They must
ensure that farmers get the real benefit of organic farming. Otherwise, traders
and middlemen will take away the major share without investing the sweat. Marketers should make sure that they really
sell organic foods at affordable prices. There are claims that some farmers are
getting good yields with organic farming. In this spirit, it is not fare to
blame the universities and scientists. Their contributions must be
acknowledged. Agricultural Universities have some set systems and protocols to
analyze and understand the new issues. Unless they study systematically for
longer period, they cannot jump into any conclusion. Of course, they wish every
farmer to get higher yields and better price for their produce.
In a large country like India, people do not realize
unless there is a strong social problem. Since it is the beginning, it takes
some more time to understand the dynamics of organic farming. Till such time
researchers, policy makers and economists should not wait. They must be able to
understand the possible positive and negative impacts of organic farming with special
reference to staple food crops and draw conclusion on the rate and direction at
which it should go.
No comments:
Post a Comment